MAN OF STEEL NEEDS AN ENEMA

Because MAN OF STEEL is kind of shitty.

I am going to do something different this time and talk about things I liked as well as the perpetual shit parade that pranced throughout my viewing of this movie.

I was okay with Superman killing Zod. I was okay with the destruction of Metropolis. At that point in the film Zod was–while wanting to pummel Kal-El into oblivion–still more interested in the annihilation of humanity. Had they pulled a SUPERMAN II move I am confident that this Zod would have simply erased Metropolis from the face of the planet, rather than flying after Superman to some remote location.

THINGS I LIKED:

  • Faora. She will be mine. Oh yes, she will be mine. I was also a big fan of how she fights. What, you thought I was just thinking with my penis here? Using super speed to traverse the extremely short distances between her and her enemies was fun to watch and a good use of her new-found powers.

  • Kevin Costner. He probably had the best performance out of anyone in the film.
  • Costume and set design, especially on Krypton. I even warmed up to Superman’s new suit.
  • When Thick Morpheus grabbed his compadres during the destruction of Metropolis and, instead of continuing to run along the path of a falling skyscraper a la PROMETHEUS, he ducked down the nearest side street.
  • Superman finding his inner …Superman and, despite the fifty-five billion tons of Kryptonian gravity bearing down on him, finds his can of spinach and manages to fly up and curb stomp the world machine.
  • Lois Lane making fun of Superman and informing him that it is, in fact, an S on his chest.

THINGS I DIDN’T LIKE:

  • You’re going to change the world x65. I didn’t actually count to see how many times Clark was told that he would change the world, but basing it on how annoyed I became with the line I am estimating it being uttered no less than sixty-five times.

  • Shaky cam. I hate American film makers with such unbridled fury that my rage could burn up the sun and blacken our solar system permanently. For once I would like to watch a new triple A movie that wasn’t filmed with a fucking GoPro or Handycam. I would also like to see a movie that doesn’t have scene cuts every four to six seconds, especially during climactic fight sequences. Anyone watch BULLET TO THE HEAD? I recommend students of film seeing it at least once so they can log it away as how fight scenes should never be done.
  • Lens flares. I know everyone in Hollywood seems to be infatuated with burning the collective retina of their audience with shiny bullshit. It ruins immersion. I’m supposed to BE THERE, right? Especially with all that camera being three inches from the faces of the actors, held by a man with late-stage Parkinson’s disease crap. I thought the point of shaky cam and “Is that a hair coming out of his nose?” cinematography was to help the audience feel immersed in the flick, then they go and ruin it by adding lens flare effects. If I were actually there, on Krypton, I WOULDN’T SEE LENS FLARES, JACKASSES! Jor-El doesn’t see lens flares, why should I be subjected to their headache inducing effects? You have multi-million dollar equipment and tens of thousands of dollars worth of education, some of which to teach you how to avoid real lens flares and other camera anomalies, and then you ask the guys in the visual effects department to add a metric ton of them back in? Fuck you.
  • Zod. I was in no way, shape or form, ever intimidated by this man. In fact, it seemed to me that he was doing far less acting and far more reading all of his lines from a cue card, and reading them poorly. I’m not saying we needed a different actor–although that may have helped–I’m just saying that maybe once or twice during production Zack Snyder could have taken him aside and, you know, politely asked him to do his job. The Zod from Superman II was way more scary than this guy, and he was practically a string bean!
  • Krypton’s “atmosphere” rendering Superman helpless. I almost wanted this to make sense, but then I realized that Zod and his henchmen were capable of super strength while still breathing in Krypton’s atmosphere by way of their respirators. Why are they still super strong but it strips Kal-El of his powers? I attempted to argue with myself that they’re so used to Krypton’s gravity that they merely appear to be super strong while on Earth. But that’s crap, because if their ship really simulated Krypton’s gravity how come Lois Lane’s frail, human body wasn’t instantaneously crushed when she boarded? You know, like how all the cars and buildings were reduced to two dimensions during the brief terraforming of the planet to mimic Kryptonian conditions. Woops?
  • Along the same lines, I wasn’t really cool with how it took Clark Kent 33 years to acquire, hone, and control his powers but it required Zod and his goons roughly forty-five seconds to do the same. Especially when the movie attempts to explain that over the course of those 33 years Superman has absorbed so much of the sun’s radiation that it has made him immensely strong. But somehow Zod’s cells can replicate that process in just a handful of minutes. Wut?
  • Finally… Flying in the infinite vaccuum of space where there exists no air or atmosphere: NO PROBLEM! Breathing “Kryptonian atmosphere” for fifteen seconds: OMG, WHERE ALL MY POWERS GO? Anyone else facepalming out there?

So really, to sum everything up, the entire problem with MAN OF STEEL wasn’t that Zack Snyder reinvented the character, loosely based on the previous seventy-five years of canon. The problem is that he wanted to turn Superman into a science fiction movie but neither he nor his writers were intelligent enough to make it happen. Which is, honestly, a major failing of just about all science fiction movies. So thank you, Mr. Snyder, for shitting all over nearly a century of canon in favor of creating something that managed to make even less sense than a man who uses a pair of eyeglasses as the primary element to his alter ego disguise.

Young Adult – Not Even.

So, we rented our usual pile of movies last weekend. We try to choose a variety – ones we know we’ll love or hate and ones we have no idea about. Young Adult was one of the latter, and I actually chose it because I generally love Charlize Theron and thought it would be a fun, quirky comedy.

Guess again.

The main character is despicable. She drinks constantly, looks dishevelled and wears dirty clothing unless she decides that nice clothing and hair would better serve her purpose. She decides that she wants to travel back to her hometown and get back the love of her life – who is also married and has a child. The premise of the movie is that this woman has been writing Young Adult-style high school teen-fantasy novels for so long that she is essentially stuck in one in her own head.

Great premise for a comedy, right?

Wrong.

For some reason, the makers of this movie decided it would be better off as a harsh lesson about life. 90% of the movie is in fact the opposite of funny – it inspires pure, unadulterated hatred for the main character as she ruthlessly uses people and rubber bands between traipsing around happily being a bitch and drinking herself into a stupor to forget how much of a bitch she is.

I did not feel sorry for her. I felt sorry for her parents, her friends, and basically anyone else she interacted with, but with her? Hell no. I found myself hoping halfway through the movie that she would suffer an unfortunate accident at the hands of a drunk motorist and either die or be permanently crippled.

Now, I won’t diss Charlize. She did a fantastic job making me hate her. Patton Oswalt was also fabulous as usual. I just don’t understand why they took that direction with this film. “Let’s make a movie about someone that no one can relate to and that everyone will hate. Yeah! That will do real well.”

Riiiiight.

I would have been happier with a Ben Stiller-esque film where you AT LEAST feel bad for the main character as he/she undergoes all sorts of horrible and embarassing social encounters and shenanigans. At least I would have felt something besides irritation.

I don’t see a reason to rent this. Don’t waste your money.

 

The Hunger Games (2012)

Shaky cam for the loss. Nothing pisses me off more than shaky camera work. We spend millions of dollars on research to figure out how to film movies better and then we hand a camcorder to some asshole and tell him to run around with it while filming. Okay, so it’s not as shitty as Cloverfield was in terms of camera stability, but it is still really bad.

Every scene is as zoomed in as it can possibly get, which sucks an ass because there are so many awesome costumes and outfits they have the characters wearing and you never really get to see them. It makes me wonder why they bothered hiring someone to make costumes in the first place if they were planning on filming the movie this way. If you thought Transformers sucked when seventy-five tons of steel roared by the camera and you couldn’t tell what the hell was even going on, you’ll be right at home hating this movie. Same god damn thing–characters roll past the camera and you can’t tell what’s happening in the scene. I assume the filmmakers thought it would lend a certain sense of urgency to the action–IT DOES NOT! It lends a certain sense of I just wasted money wanting to see this raging pile of shit and thanks to poor decisions by the creative staff I can’t even tell what I’m watching to begin with.

There was also zero character development outside of the primary actors. The little black girl who dies? I couldn’t have cared less because they didn’t bother to develop her character into something I gave two shits about. You literally get to see her twice for a total of ten seconds prior to Katniss saving her ass and then promptly not saving her ass five minutes later when she dies. Who. Cares.

My final complaint is “May the odds be ever in your favor.” Tag line, right? Seems fine. It’s used twice within five minutes. Then more as the movie goes on. The overuse of the saying reduces it to the realm of campy and stupid in a movie that’s not trying to be campy or stupid.

On the up side, Stanley Tucci was awesome, but that doesn’t surprise me and it shouldn’t surprise you either. The movie really is a shame because I could see what they wanted to do with it, they just never got there. The acting is decent and had the cinematography been worth a damn I would easily give the movie an above average rating. Unfortunately, someone didn’t get fired in time to save this mess and the movie descends into the realm of hard, unrelenting suck because of it.

One star.