MAN OF STEEL NEEDS AN ENEMA

Because MAN OF STEEL is kind of shitty.

I am going to do something different this time and talk about things I liked as well as the perpetual shit parade that pranced throughout my viewing of this movie.

I was okay with Superman killing Zod. I was okay with the destruction of Metropolis. At that point in the film Zod was–while wanting to pummel Kal-El into oblivion–still more interested in the annihilation of humanity. Had they pulled a SUPERMAN II move I am confident that this Zod would have simply erased Metropolis from the face of the planet, rather than flying after Superman to some remote location.

THINGS I LIKED:

  • Faora. She will be mine. Oh yes, she will be mine. I was also a big fan of how she fights. What, you thought I was just thinking with my penis here? Using super speed to traverse the extremely short distances between her and her enemies was fun to watch and a good use of her new-found powers.

  • Kevin Costner. He probably had the best performance out of anyone in the film.
  • Costume and set design, especially on Krypton. I even warmed up to Superman’s new suit.
  • When Thick Morpheus grabbed his compadres during the destruction of Metropolis and, instead of continuing to run along the path of a falling skyscraper a la PROMETHEUS, he ducked down the nearest side street.
  • Superman finding his inner …Superman and, despite the fifty-five billion tons of Kryptonian gravity bearing down on him, finds his can of spinach and manages to fly up and curb stomp the world machine.
  • Lois Lane making fun of Superman and informing him that it is, in fact, an S on his chest.

THINGS I DIDN’T LIKE:

  • You’re going to change the world x65. I didn’t actually count to see how many times Clark was told that he would change the world, but basing it on how annoyed I became with the line I am estimating it being uttered no less than sixty-five times.

  • Shaky cam. I hate American film makers with such unbridled fury that my rage could burn up the sun and blacken our solar system permanently. For once I would like to watch a new triple A movie that wasn’t filmed with a fucking GoPro or Handycam. I would also like to see a movie that doesn’t have scene cuts every four to six seconds, especially during climactic fight sequences. Anyone watch BULLET TO THE HEAD? I recommend students of film seeing it at least once so they can log it away as how fight scenes should never be done.
  • Lens flares. I know everyone in Hollywood seems to be infatuated with burning the collective retina of their audience with shiny bullshit. It ruins immersion. I’m supposed to BE THERE, right? Especially with all that camera being three inches from the faces of the actors, held by a man with late-stage Parkinson’s disease crap. I thought the point of shaky cam and “Is that a hair coming out of his nose?” cinematography was to help the audience feel immersed in the flick, then they go and ruin it by adding lens flare effects. If I were actually there, on Krypton, I WOULDN’T SEE LENS FLARES, JACKASSES! Jor-El doesn’t see lens flares, why should I be subjected to their headache inducing effects? You have multi-million dollar equipment and tens of thousands of dollars worth of education, some of which to teach you how to avoid real lens flares and other camera anomalies, and then you ask the guys in the visual effects department to add a metric ton of them back in? Fuck you.
  • Zod. I was in no way, shape or form, ever intimidated by this man. In fact, it seemed to me that he was doing far less acting and far more reading all of his lines from a cue card, and reading them poorly. I’m not saying we needed a different actor–although that may have helped–I’m just saying that maybe once or twice during production Zack Snyder could have taken him aside and, you know, politely asked him to do his job. The Zod from Superman II was way more scary than this guy, and he was practically a string bean!
  • Krypton’s “atmosphere” rendering Superman helpless. I almost wanted this to make sense, but then I realized that Zod and his henchmen were capable of super strength while still breathing in Krypton’s atmosphere by way of their respirators. Why are they still super strong but it strips Kal-El of his powers? I attempted to argue with myself that they’re so used to Krypton’s gravity that they merely appear to be super strong while on Earth. But that’s crap, because if their ship really simulated Krypton’s gravity how come Lois Lane’s frail, human body wasn’t instantaneously crushed when she boarded? You know, like how all the cars and buildings were reduced to two dimensions during the brief terraforming of the planet to mimic Kryptonian conditions. Woops?
  • Along the same lines, I wasn’t really cool with how it took Clark Kent 33 years to acquire, hone, and control his powers but it required Zod and his goons roughly forty-five seconds to do the same. Especially when the movie attempts to explain that over the course of those 33 years Superman has absorbed so much of the sun’s radiation that it has made him immensely strong. But somehow Zod’s cells can replicate that process in just a handful of minutes. Wut?
  • Finally… Flying in the infinite vaccuum of space where there exists no air or atmosphere: NO PROBLEM! Breathing “Kryptonian atmosphere” for fifteen seconds: OMG, WHERE ALL MY POWERS GO? Anyone else facepalming out there?

So really, to sum everything up, the entire problem with MAN OF STEEL wasn’t that Zack Snyder reinvented the character, loosely based on the previous seventy-five years of canon. The problem is that he wanted to turn Superman into a science fiction movie but neither he nor his writers were intelligent enough to make it happen. Which is, honestly, a major failing of just about all science fiction movies. So thank you, Mr. Snyder, for shitting all over nearly a century of canon in favor of creating something that managed to make even less sense than a man who uses a pair of eyeglasses as the primary element to his alter ego disguise.

Looper – Review

I spent the first 5 minutes of Looper wondering if Joseph Gordon-Levitt had a brother. Why? For this movie, they altered him with makeup (three hours’ worth, I hear) to make him look more like Bruce Willis, as he plays his younger version. And what a fantastic job they did. I actually had to imdb the movie after it started to make sure it was him. I spent time trying to find flaws with it and found none. He is painstakingly made to look like he is not wearing makeup. He also worked hard to reflect some of Bruce’s mannerisms and facial expressions – very believable. So kudos to the makeup and prosthetics team – you knocked it out of the park and I want to see more makeup jobs like this. And kudos to Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

Now, the movie.

It’s great! The action scenes are well-made and there is some humor laced into the script, which I love. The plot and premise of the movie is original and entertaining. It’s definitely worth a rewatch or two to find symbolism in the various scenes. The sci-fi aspects of the movie were well thought out and significantly less boring than the recent trash that has come out and pretended to be good sci-fi. (Total Recall and Prometheus, to name a few) I don’t really have complaints about any of the actors or really anything. It was just plain good. I’d advise at least renting it.

There are some potential flaws to the time travel aspects of the movie if you think about them too much. However, time travel is theoretical, so the director decided on his own way of doing things, which I respected and enjoyed. He also put a scene in the middle that I think speaks directly to the viewer, where Bruce Willis tells his past self to stop worrying and thinking so much about the future and live in the moment. If you as an audience member live in the moment, you will thoroughly enjoy yourself. ;)

Hope Springs for Abraham Lincoln’s Men in Black.

Men in Black III was good. Much better than the second movie but perhaps not quite as good as the first. Josh Brolin should win an Oscar for his performance as young K – his mannerisms, facial expressions, everything is just spot on. I’d say it’s worth it to rent this purely to watch him act the part.

I also loved the villain. He is quite disturbing and somehow oddly charming..and the visual design and costume for him is fantastic. Jemaine Clement was perfectly cast for the role. Emma Thompson was great as O and I would like to see more of her in the future – she was a nice balance for J and K’s banter. I don’t really have any complaints about the movie as a whole. It’s not life-changing or groundbreaking, but it’s an excellent part to the series, in fact, I think the second one should be abolished (SO BAD) and this should replace it. The humor is fun and the jokes weren’t overdone. Definitely rent!

——————-

Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter impressed me. I was expecting a very corny hack-and-slash Resident Evil type flick. Definitely not the direction they took it in. It’s serious, yes, which I have read many reviewers complain about – but it’s not so serious that it undermines how awesomely silly the premise of the movie is. They maintain a solid pace and storyline, which made it more entertaining, at least for me. Maybe it’s because I’m Canadian. Who knows. Altering important political history to include the supernatural…epic.

In any case, I found the fight scenes extremely fun yet dramatic, colorful, and well-thought-out..very Matrixy. They provide an excellent counterbalance to the serious political tone. And they’re ORIGINAL – when’s the last time you saw two men fighting while jumping through and over a stampeding herd of horses? Never. Elegance and an almost comic-book exaggeration combined to make this so cool. The acting was pretty good. I’m still not sure I’m 100% sold on Benjamin Walker as Abe, but besides that I don’t recall anyone bothering me. Sturgess is a quick and easy favorite, very likeable, and I would have liked to see more of him.

If you’re a serious patriot who is very gung-ho about politics and/or America, you probably won’t like this movie. You probably also won’t be reading this review because you’re busy getting your guns ready to prepare yourself for government invasion, so I most likely don’t need to worry. ;)

I would definitely advise Abe Lincoln: Vampire Hunter for a rental, especially if you like old-style movies or are in an action kind of mood. You can’t really go wrong. The movie has a nice wave pattern in terms of action versus story, so don’t expect constant mind-shattering explosions, but I’d be surprised if you didn’t enjoy at least some of the ride.

——————–

Hope Springs is arguably one of the best serious movies I’ve seen in a while. Yes, it’s sad..and romantic. I’ve read lots of complaints from men on Rotten Tomatoes who thought it was a “total chick flick” and that they should have “left it for the wife to watch”…but really, as long as you don’t have an ego the size of the Death Star and you can admit that as a man, you have emotions too, you might enjoy it. ;) People who complain that romance between elderly people is creepy, seriously, you need to grow the fuck up – you’re going to be old some day too. And yes, you’ll have sex. And no, you won’t look sleek and well-muscled anymore. Surprise!!

The acting, as expected, is phenomenal. Meryl Streep is never bad. Tommy Lee Jones..also never bad. And Steve Carell, while in a serious movie, still manages to make us giggle even though most of his lines are actually quite serious. I thought it was an excellent transition for him from comedic to serious, especially in comparison to some of the crap Paul Rudd or Adam Sandler have done when trying to jump from one to the other. He actually makes it work here.

A major flaw of many romantic dramas is that the conflict is often forced. I.e, the woman THINKS the man is doing something and rather than talking about it for 30 seconds and finding out it’s untrue, she immediately has a conniption fit and leaves the country. No forced conflict here. I thought the movie had a very real flow with very real things happening. I felt like just slapping both of them in the face occasionally and saying “GUYS!!! WHY DID YOU LET IT GET LIKE THIS!!”, but I think that’s the point…to jerk you around emotionally and make you feel for their situation, whether you can relate to it or not.

Rent this but be prepared for sad. It’s not a comedy – don’t get it if you think you will spend your time laughing. Just like love, it’s a bit of a struggle with ups and downs, but in the end – well, you’ll have to see. ;)

Totally Recalling the neighborhood Watch for Resident Evil

The Watch:

I went into this expecting a pretty terrible movie. I wasn’t sure how (based on the previews) Ben Stiller and his backup cast of rude comedians were going to last for an hour and a half walking around the neighborhood being clumsy and stupid. But the movie took a turn for the better relatively quickly. It’s not what you thought it was about, trust me. I will keep it a secret even throughout this review and only say that I was pleasantly surprised with the plot. It’s a much more entertaining experience if you don’t look up what the movie is actually about.

Yes, it was still stupid, riddled with Vince Vaughn’s usual machine gun wit and Jonah Hill’s rude and lewd shtick. Richard Ayoade was a pleasant counterbalance with his British accent and uberpolite delivery of vulgar lines. I am looking forward to seeing the next movie he does; he was quite enjoyable.

I think the main complaint I have is the attempt to lace the movie with a serious subplot about Ben Stiller’s character being sterile. It’s just..strange and seems not to fit. They’re spending a lot of time talking about dicks and balls, as expected, and the serious edge was odd to me.

Overall, at least worth renting for kicks.

Resident Evil: Retribution:

This is on about the same level as the other Resident Evil movies. Silly one-liners, lots of zombies and assorted mutations, and evil corporation blablabla. If you were entertained by the others, you’ll like this one fine. I enjoyed the addition of Leon, the main character in the video game franchise, and Ada Wong. The costumes were awesome and the large zombie creature they used was well-animated and pretty freakish. I also loved the SOUNDS they used for the guns – I’m not sure what they did, but it felt so satisfying whenever she shot a zombie. I think they used a more video game-type effect for these and I think that was an excellent move. Unrealistic, maybe..but better. Why resort to realism when people are flying around the air like Olympic gymnasts killing the crap out of some zombies? Exactly.

Overall…the usual.

Total Recall:

This COULD have been an amazing remake. Could have, but didn’t quite stand up.

The action scenes were great. The combat between Kate Beckinsale and Jessica Biel was fabulous and sexy, and Kate Beckinsale does a fantastic job as a villain. I loved the effects and how things were visually. There were some gravity reversal combat scenes that absolutely destroyed. So far so good.

But WHY did they make so many changes to the plot? Okay, it takes place on Earth instead of Mars. I can wrap my head around that. Fine. But I don’t think they THOUGHT about it other than making a cool tunnel allowing people to travel through the core of the Earth to the other side. Very cool. Further than that? Brian Cranston is always great but his character has flimsy motives. For some reason, he wants to kill all of the citizens in the ghettos of the city and replace them with robots….making sense yet? It never does. He also seems to show up everywhere instead of sending cronies. This guy is the freaking big bad guy in charge..and he shows up for invasions with his robots!

Also disappointing was the transformation of the movie from science fiction to post apocalyptic, sort-of not-really science fiction. They completely removed mutants and the concept thereof, which kills of a large part of the plot, including the removal of Matthias himself housing a little alien being on his chest. No more aliens, no more mutants. Matthias is on screen for what may be a total of 3 minutes and then dies. Did I care when he did? No…his death brought zero consequence to the movie’s plot, unlike in the first Total Recall. He died and I forgot he died 5 minutes later as I watched the main characters jump around on weird 3D elevators. Cool, but the plot keeps falling into these weird holes that wouldn’t have been there if they hadn’t tried to so drastically change it from the first movie. Oh, and they left the three-breasted woman as a type of homage. BUT THE HOMAGE MAKES NO SENSE BECAUSE THERE ARE NO MUTANTS IN THIS VERSION. So how does she have three breasts? Did she just get a third one put there? What the hell.

Colin Farrell does an alright job. It’s not quite as fantastic as when you see Arnold running around like a bull in a china shop killing people and freaking out, though. I don’t know that anyone could match that.

Overall, as a standalone movie, passable. As a remake, meh. I wasn’t as impressed as I should have been. Disappointed.

The Dark Knight Rises & Falls On Its Ass

The trilogy has ended. Batman has been immortalized in bronze at city hall while Bruce Wayne anonymously lives out the remainder of his years with Selina Kyle. Happy Ending?

Not quite. In all honesty, the film was pretty boring. Let’s ignore for a minute that Chris Nolan did to BATMAN what M. Night Shamalamadingdong did to THE LAST AIRBENDER–that would be to abandon established lore in favor of writing your own stripped down, anorexic bullshit–the only major difference being that Chris Nolan can actually direct actors. That has never been my problem with the new Batman; the actors generally deliver decent to good performances, my problem is that I just don’t care about them.

Mr. Nolan did his best to reboot the series into a dark, gritty world more akin to our own reality than it is to the comic books. The problem he forgot to address is that in reality life is fleeting and people die. In THE DARK KNIGHT RISES nobody of concern ends up getting killed. You never feel afraid for any of the primary characters. Again, that is not necessarily a problem with movies in general, but it is a problem in this film because of how they have tried to depict the world of Batman. Strip away the violent, dirty exoskeleton of Gotham and you’re left with a run of the mill super hero movie.

The movie, at first, appears to suffer from the trying to do too much in too little a time frame dilemma that many modern movies subscribe to. After closer examination you find that the movie does the opposite–it attempts to stretch the little it has too far and too thin. Here’s a quick timeline: Batman returns to the scene after eight years of absence, Batman has his ass handed to him by Bane, Bane threatens to blow up Gotham with a nuclear weapon, Batman returns (again) and this time manages to win with the help of Catwoman. You need three hours to tell that story? I suppose you should tack on an extra hour for all the whining Alfred ends up doing.

Speaking of Catwoman. I absolutely love (read: loathe) how Bruce Wayne keeps giving her the benefit of the doubt, despite the fact she’s burned him several times throughout the movie. She’s given him no reason to trust her, or even like her, but he still follows her around with puppy-dog eyes. In the comic Catwoman fights an internal conflict over her life as a cat burglar and helping people. She’s not inherently evil in the comic, she’s more indifferent than anything, but she does give Batman reasons to trust her from time to time other than flashing her finely manicured backyard so he begins following the Bat-cock instead of actually thinking.

There was also zero chemistry between the two actors. None. Maybe they just grazed over those scenes and did them in one take. Who knows? I don’t. We’re also constantly reminded throughout the film that Bruce Wayne could have gone anywhere, done anything, but instead he decided to put the cape back on and save the people. As if we needed the movie itself to tell us that we’re watching Batman, what the fuck else is he going to do if not save Gotham for the nth-hundredth time? In the end these scenes serve only one purpose: TO SHAVE PRECIOUS SECONDS OFF OF MY LIFE. Filler dialogue does not make for a good movie going experience.

The usual suspects continue to plague this movie: the “bat voice”, for one. Even when he’s in a scene involving characters who already know that he’s Bruce Wayne he feels it necessary to keep laryngitis bat going. Not to be outdone, the boys in post added so much shitty processing to Bane’s voice that it makes it difficult to not press STOP and EJECT on the DVD. Was there no one around when they were dicking with this shit? No one to say “Hey guys, his voice is coming in WAY louder than everyone else in the scene, and it’s in full stereo. Why don’t we pull our heads out of our asses?”

What do I mean by full stereo? When you watch the movie you’ll notice in scenes where Bane does any amount of talking that his voice seems to fill the entire room. The other actors in the scene have their voices mixed directional, so that if someone is on the left side of the screen their voice is coming out slightly more on the left speaker than on the right, but Bane’s voice fills the entire aural spectrum. It instantly ruins any amount of immersion you may have had in the movie up until that point.

All in all the movie floats somewhere between bad and average. I don’t understand the hype. I would only recommend it to fans of super hero movies. Everyone else should stay clear.